Search for: All records

Abstract Vulnerability to warming is often assessed using short‐term metrics such as the critical thermal maximum (CT_MAX), which represents an organism's ability to survive extreme heat. However, the long‐term effects of sub‐lethal warming are an essential link to fitness in the wild, and these effects are not adequately captured by metrics like CT_MAX.The meltwater stonefly,Lednia tumana, is endemic to high‐elevation streams of Glacier National Park, MT, USA, and has long been considered acutely vulnerable to climate‐change‐associated stream warming. As a result, in 2019, it was listed as Threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. This presumed vulnerability to warming was challenged by a recent study showing that nymphs can withstand short‐term exposure to temperatures as high as ~27°C. But whether they also tolerate exposure to chronic, long‐term warming remained unclear.By measuring fitness‐related traits at several ecologically relevant temperatures over several weeks, we show thatL. tumanacannot complete its life‐cycle at temperatures only a few degrees above what some populations currently experience.The temperature at which growth rate was maximized appears to have a detrimental impact on other key traits (survival, emergence success and wing development), thus extending our understanding ofL. tumana's vulnerability to climate change.Our results call into question the use of CT_MAXas a sole metric of thermal sensitivity for a species, while highlighting the power and complexity of multi‐trait approaches to assessing vulnerability. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.